London’s latest budget brings an unwelcome surprise: a significant property tax increase for 2024. If we want to avoid yearly hikes like this, it’s time to address one of the budget’s biggest expenses: the continual expansion and maintenance of roads due to boundary growth.
In the midst of a housing crisis, we need to rally behind The London Plan, the city’s blueprint for smart growth. Adopted in 2016, this plan prioritizes building homes in established neighborhoods already supported by infrastructure like streets, transit, and schools.
The Case for Density
“More dense cities are more tax effective,” says Martin Horak, a Western University urban politics professor. While transitioning to a denser city requires upfront investment in infrastructure, the long-term savings are undeniable. Denser cities spend less per person on infrastructure, ultimately reducing the tax burden on residents.
Infill projects also align with London’s mode-share target of 32.5%—a goal that ensures walking, cycling, and public transit account for one-third of all trips. This shift decreases car dependency, cuts emissions, and creates more livable urban spaces.
Challenges and Opportunities
Critics often highlight challenges, like the capacity of existing infrastructure to handle new developments. But these challenges aren’t insurmountable. Cities like Hamilton and Ottawa have proven that prioritizing infill development over suburban sprawl saves money and manages growth effectively.
What’s Next?
It’s time for Londoners to advocate for solutions that maintain The London Plan’s vision. By focusing on density, sustainable transit, and smarter infrastructure investments, we can reduce our tax burden while creating a city built for the future.
London politicians need to hear loud and clear: “Yes, in our backyard.”
Andrew McClenaghan, a lifelong Londoner, owns London Bicycle Café and built a successful digital agency.
This piece is based on an article from the London Free Press.